It looks like you are using an unsupported browser. You can still place orders by emailing us on info@ossila.com, but you may experience issues browsing our website. Please consider upgrading to a modern browser for better security and an improved browsing experience.

Exploring Signal-To-Noise Ratio of the Ossila Spectrofluorometer

Jump to: Measuring Signal-to-Noise Ratio | FKS5 Fluorescence Slides | Fluorophore Concentration Study | SNR with Slit Width


Spectrofluorometer signal to noise ratio

A common method of measuring signal to noise ratio of spectrofluorometers is to measure the Raman peak of water at 397 nm compared to 450 nm (where no Raman peak is present), illuminating at 350 nm. This is a suitable demonstration for the Ossila Spectrofluorometer as it is outside of the systems usable wavelength range.

However, without a standard measurement, taking one fixed value for signal to noise ratio becomes more difficult. Therefore, we have taken various measurements to explore the sensitivity range of the spectrofluorometer under various conditions.

Firstly, we measured various fluorescent microscope slides (Thorlabs FSK5) to provide an easy standard measurement that can be easily replicated. This method revealed a maximum SNR of 26,000:1.

Secondly, we dissolved a well-characterized fluorophore (4CzIPN) at various concentrations in toluene. 4CzIPN is a thermally activated delayed fluorescence material. It is a popular TADF-OLED material due to its high PLQY. Signal-to-noise will obviously be affected by the height of the signal, but we hope this study will help demonstrate the measurement capabilities of the Ossila Spectrofluorometer using actual organic fluorophores. This achieved a maximum SNR of 5000:1.

Finally, to explore the full potential of Spectrofluorometer sensitivities, we tracked signal to noise ratio by varying the slit width entering the monochromator detector. With this, the system can achieve SNR of up to 80,000:1 with minimal impact on resolution (measured through FWHM).

Measuring Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)


We have chosen to use the RMS method to calculate signal to noise ratio from these fluoroesence measurements. This follows this equation:

Equation signal to noise ratio for spectrofluorometer

Where the signal value (Speak) was measured at the peak of each measurement, with the noise measurement (Snoise) taken at 800 nm where there is no signal.

NRMS represents the background noise of the spectrofluorometer. This is calculated separately from the main signal, where a dark spectra is taken. This NRMS is calculated according to the following equation:

FKS5 Fluorescent Slides


Fluorescent slide for standard measurement

The ideal orientation of the fluorescent slides was found any measurements taken. This sample is then excited with the UV light source (at 365 nm) while the spectrofluorometer scanned through various emission wavelengths (485-800 nm with a 1 nm wavelength step).

The fluorescence spectra for each FKS5 fluorescent slide is shown above, with the SNR in the table below. This varies from 2,000:1 for the lowest intensity emission, to 26,000:1 for the maximum sample.

Sample SNR
Green 26,000:1
Yellow 16,000:1
Orange 9,000:1
Red 2,000:1
FKS5 fluorescent samples fluorescence measurements
Fluorescence of FKS5 fluorescence slides

The fluorescence spectra for each FKS5 fluorescent slide is shown above, with the SNR in the table below. This varies from 2,000:1 for the lowest intensity emission, to 26,000:1 for the maximum sample.

Fluorophore Concentration Study


Fluorescence Emission Spectra

We varied the concentration of the TADF material, 4CzIPN, to explore the signal-to-noise ratios at various molarities. The solution was dissolved in toluene and excited with the UV light source (at 365 nm) and the spectrofluorometer scanned through various emission wavelengths (405-800 nm with a 5 nm wavelength step).

4CzIPN fluorescence spectrum
4CzIPN dissolved in toluene at various molarities.

For the 10-4 -10-6 M solutions there is a significant reduction in peak intensity with reducing fluorophore concentration (as expected). However, there is a significant reduction in PL intensity for the 10-3 solution. There also appears to be slight red shift in the fluorescence peak of the 10-3 molarity solution (although the wavelength step used in this experiment is too large to probe this shift in any detail). These effects are likely caused by the aggregation of 4CzIPN molecules in higher concentrations.

Signal-to-Noise Ratio

The resulting values of signal-to-noise ratio are as follows.

Concentration of Fluorophore SNR
10-3 3400:1
10-4 5300:1
10-5 2200:1
10-6 230:1

As expected, increasing peak leads to increased SNR. The peak SNR value is 5000:1. This value falls when the count number falls below 1000.

At Lower Concentrations (10-7 – 10-8)

Low concentration fluorescence study
Fluorescence of lower concentration (10-7-10-8) compared to toluene background

At lower concentrations, the likelihood of 4CzIPN molecules interacting with the incoming light reduces, therefore background illumination appears to overwhelm the signal.

However, if you have taken a background measurement, by comparing the normalized PL of the signals to the normalized background signal, you can still see the presence of the 4CzIPN peaks.

Normalized, background-corrected fluorescence 4CzIPN
Normalized background-corrected fluorescence of 4CzIPN in toluene at 10-7-10-8

SNR Variation with Slit Width


To fully examine achievable measurement sensitivity, we measured the FKS5 sample with the highest signal (green - 503 nm emission) at various slit widths. The slit width varied changes the amount of light that enters the monochromator that dispersed light before hitting the SiPM detector.

SNR variation impact on signal-to-noise ratio
Fluorescence of FKS5 sample (green) with various slit widths.
Slit Width SNR Slit Width SNR
25 μm 2,000:1 150 μm 32,000:1
50 μm 9,000:1 200 μm 49,000:1
75 μm 16,000:1 300 μm 60,000:1
100 μm 26,000:1 400 μm 81,000:1
125 μm 27,000:1 500 μm 73,000:1

SNR greatly increases with increasing slit width, reaching maximum values of 81,000:1.

It is important to bear in mind that increasing slit width of the detector’s monochromator increase sensitivity can reduce the system resolution. However, this also depends on the narrowness of the emission peak itself.

To explore the impact of this in this measurement, we measured the FWHM for each peak. We found that increasing slit width makes little difference on peak resolution until a slit width of over 100 μm width. Even after this point, the increase in FWHM compared to the peak intensities is minimal.

Slit Width FWHM Slit Width FWHM
25 μm 52 150 μm 56
50 μm 52 200 μm 59
75 μm 53 300 μm 65
100 μm 53 400 μm 70
125 μm 55 500 μm 81

Contributors


Written by

Bhoomi Shah

Student Collaborator

Dr. Mary O'Kane

Application Scientist