What are Metal Organic Frameworks?

Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a class of 3D materials that are made up of metals connected by organic linker compounds. Think of metals and organic compounds as building blocks that form structures. These structures come in a variety of shapes and sizes, ranging from 1D to 3D. The building blocks create a repeating pattern therefore MOFs are often described as reticular (gridlike). MOFs are like an atomic scale version of the magnetic ball and stick toys where the metals act as connectors and the organic compounds act as linkers. There are 90,000+ different MOFs out there and many more to be discovered!

Metal-organic frameworks are also known as:

Hybrid organic−inorganic materials
Metal-organic polymers
Coordination polymers
Organic zeolite analogues

On This Page

Metal Nodes and Clusters
Organic Linker Compounds
MOFs Structure and Porosity
Types of Metal Organic Framework
Coordination Bonds

Metal Nodes and Clusters

Metals nodes within metal organic frameworks can be just one atom or a cluster of atoms. They are also referred to as metal centers or inorganic centers. Multiple organic linker compounds can bond to single metal centre. Clusters of metal atoms, often connected by oxygen, also act as connectors between organic linkers. Examples of metal clusters are:

M₃O (M = Al, Fe, Cr)
M₄O (M = Zn)
M₆O₄(OH)₄ (M = Zr, Hf, Ce)
M₈O₈(OH)₄ (M = Ti)

Metal clusters are also referred to as secondary building units (SBUs). Strong bonds within metal clusters gives them specific geometries. The atoms are precisely arranged with designated sites for connectivity. As a result, coordination bonds with linkers occur in predicable and repeating patterns.

The metal centers bring their own chemical properties to the metal organic framework. Here are a few examples:

Metal	Properties
Cu, Ni, Co	Catalytic
Fe	Magnetic, catalytic, biocompatible
Ti	Redox active, photochemical, biocompatible
Mn	Catalytic, high capacitance
Zn	Catalytic, biocompatible

Organic Linker Compounds

Organic linker compounds connect the metal centers. For an organic compound to be a linker/ligand it must have at least two coordinating sites. These sites contain electronegative atoms such as oxygen or nitrogen. Coordinating functional groups include:

Boronic acid
Carboxylic acid
Phosphonic acid
Sulfonic acid
Amine
Heterocyclic amine

Electrons from the electronegative atoms are shared with metal centers. This is called a coordination bond and will be discussed in more detail below. Organic linkers are described as ditopic, tritopic, tetratopic, or multitopic depending on the number of coordinating functional groups:

Diatopic

2 coordination sites

Tritopic

3 coordination sites

Tetratopic

4 coordination sites

Multitopic

4< coordination sites

The properties of the linker compound are also incorporated into metal-organic frameworks. The structure, length, ratio, and types of functional groups in a linker affect the size, shape, and internal surface properties of a MOF. Organic linker compounds can also contain functional groups that are not involved in coordination bonds with the metal centers. These functional groups bring different properties to the MOF. They can even be modified after MOF synthesis to incorporate more properties for suitable different applications.

MOFs Structure and Porosity

Metal organic frameworks are strong, porous materials part of the porous organic frameworks family. The spaces within the connected metals and organic linkers are called pores. These pores can be very small, in the range of a few angstroms (1 angstrom = 0.1 nanometers), to relatively large, exceeding several nanometers in diameter. Pore size is controlled by the size of the linker compound used and how it coordinates with the metal center.

Some MOFs contain multiple different organic compounds, therefore different sized pores form within the structure. Unlike other porous materials, MOFs can be designed for specific applications like gas separation. This is done by selecting specific linkers to get the desired pore size. The different chemical properties of both the selected metal and organic compound also brings advantages.

Coordination Bonds

In metal organic frameworks, coordination bonds form between the metal and organic ligand. Atoms within organic compounds such as oxygen or nitrogen donate lone pairs of electrons to the metal center. It is also referred to as a dative covalent bond as both electrons in the metal-ligand bond originate from the same atom (ligand). Coordination bonding is strong but mostly reversible. You can break the bonds by changing the pH of the MOF in solution.

The number of ligands attached to the metal center is referred to as the coordination number. This can vary depending on the size, charge, and electron configuration of the metal ion as well as the size and electron-donating ability of the ligands.

Types of Metal Organic Framework

Metal organic frameworks are named in a variety of ways but all have a lettered code with a number following it (eg. ZIF-8). Some are named based on their features. MOFs with similar structures but with slightly different organic components are described as isoreticular ("iso" = same) MOFs and are named IRMOFs. Other MOFs are name based on where they were discovered (eg. UiO - University of Oslo). The number that follows the lettered code indicates the specific MOF within the family. Here are the families:

Porous Coordination Networks (PCNs)
Isoreticular MOFs (IRMOF)
Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs)
Materials Institute Lavoisier (MIL)
Porous Coordination Polymers (PCPs)
University of Oslo (UiO)
Northwestern University (NU)
Pohang University of Science and Technology (POST-n)
Dresden University of Technology (DUT-n family)
University of Nottingham (NOTT-n)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST-n)
Christian-Albrechts-University (CAU-n family)

MOF Ligands

Multitopic
Multifunctional
Modular

Available from £70

References

Li, C. et al. (2022). Metal Centers and Organic Ligands Determine Electrochemistry of Metal–Organic Frameworks, Small, 18. doi:10.1002/smll.202106607

Yang, D. et al. (2020). The Surface Chemistry of Metal Oxide Clusters: From Metal–Organic Frameworks to Minerals, ACS Cent. Sci., 6. doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00803

Kalmutzki, M. et al. (2018). Secondary building units as the turning point in the development of the reticular chemistry of MOFs, Sci. Adv., 4. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat9180

Yusuf, V. et al. (2022). Review on Metal−Organic Framework Classification, Synthetic Approaches, and Influencing Factors: Applications in Energy, Drug Delivery, and Wastewater Treatment., ACS Omega, 7.doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c05310

Kaushal, S. et al. (2021). First transition series metal–organic frameworks: synthesis, properties and applications. Mater. Adv., 2. doi:10.1039/D1MA00719J

Kathuria, A. et al.(2023). Environmentally benign bioderived, biocompatible, thermally stable MOFs suitable for food contact applications, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 138, doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.06.024

Kirlikovali, K. et al.(2023). Back to the Basics: Developing Advanced Metal–Organic Frameworks Using Fundamental Chemistry Concepts. ACS Nanosci. Au, 3, doi:10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00046

Cheng, H. et al.(2023). Advances in Mn-Based MOFs and Their Derivatives for High-Performance Supercapacitor. Small, doi:10.1002/smll.202308804

Lee, S. et al. (2023). Multicomponent Metal-Organic Frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., doi:10.1002/anie.202306341

Ding, M. et al. (2019). Improving MOF stability: approaches and applications. Chem. Sci., 10, doi:10.1039/C9SC03916C

Contributors

Written by

Dr. Amelia Wood

Application Scientist

Diagrams by

Sam Force

Graphic Designer