Perovskites and Perovskite Solar Cells: An Introduction
The rapid improvement of perovskite solar cells has made them the rising star of the photovoltaics world and of huge interest to the academic community. Since their operational methods are still relatively new, there is great opportunity for further research into the basic physics and chemistry around perovskites. Furthermore, there is huge potential for engineering better, more efficient solar cells which are expected to reach in excess of 20% power conversion efficiency.
Why are perovskite solar cells so significant?
There are two key graphs which demonstrate why perovskite solar cells have attracted such prominent attention in the short time since the breakthrough paper of 2012 .
The first of these graphs, which uses data taken from NREL solar cell efficiency tables, demonstrates the power conversion efficiencies of the perovskite based devices over recent years in comparison to other technologies.
The graph shows a meteoric rise compared to most other technologies over a relatively short period of time. Although it could be argued that more resources and better infrastructure for solar cell research has been available in the last few years, the dramatic rise in efficiency is still incredibly significant and impressive. This suggests that with continued research, efficiency of perovskite based solar cells can continue to rise at this rate over the coming years.
The second key graph below is the open circuit voltage compared to the band gap for a range of technologies that the perovskites compete with.
This graph demonstrates how much of a photon’s energy is lost in the conversion process from light to electricity. For standard excitonic-based, organic-based solar cells this loss can be as high as 50% of the absorbed energy. However, for the perovskite based solar cells the loss is far less. Perovskite based solar cells are fast approaching the same level of photon energy utilisation as the current leading monolithic crystalline technologies such as silicon and GaAs. Furthermore, they also have the potential for much lower processing costs.
Currently, there is not known to be a significant negative aspect of perovskite based solar cells. Although lifetimes of the cells aren’t yet proven, there is no evidence to suggest their lifetime is any less than that of pure organic devices. The use of lead in perovskite compounds is not ideal, but it is used in much smaller quantities than that which is currently present in either lead or cadmium based batteries and there is potential for a lead alternative to be used in perovskite compounds instead. Finally, there has also been little discussion of the optical density of these materials which, although higher than silicon, is still lower than other active materials. As a result, the perovskite devices require thicker light-harvesting layers which may cause some fabrication limitations; particularly for solution processed devices where creating such thick layers with high uniformity can be difficult.
A key development will therefore be the improvement of precursor materials for solution based perovskite deposition and associated coating and processing techniques. Although at present the best perovskite solar cells are vacuum deposited, solution processed devices will ultimately yield lower production costs. While vacuum based processes are relatively easy to scale up, the capital equipment cost of doing so can rapidly become astronomical.
To enable a truly low cost-per-watt will require perovskite solar cells to have the much heralded trio of high efficiency, long lifetimes and low manufacturing costs. This has not yet been achieved for other thin film technologies but perovskite based devices so far demonstrate enormous potential for achieving this.
What are perovskites?
The term perovskite and perovskite structure are often used interchangeably. Technically, perovskite is a type of mineral that was first found in the Ural Mountains and named after Lev Perovski who was the founder of the Russian Geographical Society. A perovskite structure is any compound that has the same structure as the perovskite mineral.
True perovskite (the mineral) is formed of calcium, titanium and oxygen in the form CaTiO3. Meanwhile, a perovskite structure is anything that has the generic form ABX3 and the same crystallographic structure as perovskite (the mineral). However, since most people in the solar cell world aren’t involved with minerals and geology, perovskite and perovskite structure are used interchangeably.
The perovskite lattice arrangement is demonstrated below, but it must be considered that, as with many structures in crystallography, it can be represented in multiple ways. The simplest way to think about a perovskite is as a large atomic or molecular cation (positively charged) of type A in the centre of a cube. The corners of the cube are then occupied by atoms B (also positively charged cations) and the faces of the cube are occupied by a smaller atom X with negative charge (anion).
Dependant on which atoms/molecules are used in the structure, perovskites can have an impressive array of interesting properties including superconductivity, giant magnetoresistance, spin dependent transport (spintronics) and catalytic properties. Perovskites therefore represent an exciting playground for physicists, chemists and material scientists.
In the case of perovskite solar cells, the most efficient devices so far have been produced with the following combination of materials in the usual perovskite form ABX3:
- A = An organic cation - methylammonium (CH3NH3)+
- B = A big inorganic cation - usually lead(II) (Pb2+)
- X3= A slightly smaller halogen anion – usually chloride (Cl-) or iodide (I-)
Since this is a relatively general structure, these perovskite based devices can also be given a number of different names which can either refer to a more general class of materials or a specific combination. As an example of this we’ve created the below table to highlight how many names can be formed from one basic structure.
|Organo||Metal||Trihalide (or trihalide)|
|Methylammonium||Lead||Iodide (or triiodide)|
|Plumbate||Chloride (or trichloride)|
The perovskite name picking table: pick any one item from columns A, B or X3 to come up with a valid name. Examples include: Organo-lead-chlorides, Methylammonium-metal-trihalides, organo-plumbate-iodides etc.
The table demonstrates how vast the parameter space is for potential material/structure combinations, as there are many other atoms/molecules that could be substituted for each column. The choice of material combinations will be crucial for determining both the optical and electronic properties (e.g. bandgap and commensurate absorption spectra, mobility, diffusion lengths, etc). A simple brute-force optimisation by combinatorial screening in the lab is likely to be very inefficient at finding good perovskite structures. As such, while the field of perovskite solar cells has progressed rapidly so far with only a basic know-how of the photo physics and structural chemistry, to fully optimise devices will require far more in-depth knowledge than is currently available.
Fabrication and Measurement of Perovskite Solar Cells
Although perovskites come from a seemingly different world of crystallography, they can be incorporated very easily into a standard OPV (or other thin film) architecture. While the best perovskite structures have been vacuum deposited to give better, more uniform film qualities, this process requires the co-evaporation of the organic (methylammonium) component at the same time as the inorganic (lead halide) components. The accurate co-evaporation of these materials to form the perovskite therefore requires specialist evaporation chambers that are not available to many researchers. This may also cause the practical issues of calibration and cross-contamination between organic and non-organic sources which would be difficult to clean.
However, the development of low temperature solution deposition routes offer a much simpler method to incorporate perovskites and can even be used with existing materials sets. Although the perovskite solar cells originally came out of DSSC research, the fact that they no longer require an oxide scaffold means the field is bifurcating and that many device architectures now look very similar to thin film photovoltaics except with the active layers substituted with the perovskite. The key to enabling this is that the perovskite precursor materials use relatively polar solvents for deposition therefore an orthogonal solvent systems for the different layers can be fairly easily developed.
The below structure represents a standard (non-inverted) perovskite solar cell based upon a standard glass/ITO substrates with metal back contact. All that is required to form a working device from the perovskite are two charge selective interface layers for the electrons and holes respectively.
Many of the standard interface layers from the world of organic photovoltaics work relatively well. For example PEDOT:PSS and the PTAA-class of polymers work well as hole interface layers while PCBM, C60, ZnO and TiO2 makes an effective electron interfaces. However, the field is so new that there is a vast archive of possible interface materials to be explored. Understanding and optimising the energy levels and interactions of different materials at these interfaces offers a very exciting area of research.
The main issue for practical device fabrication of perovskite solar cells is that of film quality and thickness. The light harvesting (active) perovskite layer needs to be several hundred nanometres thick – several times more than for standard organic photovoltaics. Unless the deposition conditions and annealing temperature are optimised rough surfaces with incomplete coverage are formed. Even with good optimisation there is still a significant surface roughness remaining, and therefore thicker interface layers than might normally be used are also required. However, the fact that efficiencies of over 11% have already been achieved for spin coated devices  is highly encouraging.
It is for this reason that we look forward to watching the progress of solution processed perovskite solar cells and to developing the techniques and devices to help researchers at the cutting edge.
For those just beginning their perovskites research, we have produced a video guide demonstrating the entire process of fabricating and measuring perovskite photovoltaics. In our own labs we have reached efficiencies in excess of 11% using this fabrication routine.
Perovskite Fabrication Video Guide
Ossila Products for Perovskite Solar Cells
Ossila’s products are rapidly being adapted for use with Perovskite solar cells and have already been used in a number of configurations. At the most basic level, most perovskite based solar cells are based upon a transparent conductive oxide coated glass substrate with evaporated metal cathode and top encapsulation. As such, our existing substrate infrastructure and perovskite materials are already being used in high performance solution processed perovskite devices. Our standard encapsulation epoxy is also perfectly suited for laminating glass or other barrier layers – as used in Gratzel’s 2014 Nature paper.
The Ossila Spin Coater is also routinely used for the deposition of our interface and active layers with high accuracy and simple operation. Our academic colleagues have also made some exciting progress on solution processed perovskite solar cells via spray coating onto our standard substrates.
Over recent months we have also worked with our academic collaborators to bring more perovskite-based products to market, including: Methylammonium Iodide which is synthesised in-house and two perovskite precursor inks. The first, I101 (MAI:PbCl2), is designed to be processed in air and has demonstrated efficiencies in our labs up to 11.7%. Our second ink, I201 (MAI:PbCl2:PbI2) is formulated to be processed in a nitrogen atmosphere, and so far we have seen efficiencies up to 11.8%. Both inks are designed to help our customers reach high efficiencies incredibly quickly when first starting out with their perovskites research. We include optimised processing routines with both inks to maximise results.
We will continue to develop our range of perovskite products in order to simplify fabrication and measurement while also developing better characterisation tools and techniques. As always, please contact us should you have any questions.
References (please note that Ossila has no formal connection to any of the authors or institutions in these references):
 Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites. Michael M. Lee et al., Science magazine, Vol 338, p643-647 (2012)
 Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells. Giles E. Eperon et al., Advanced Materials, Vol 24, p151-157 (2014)
 Perovskite solar cells employing organic charge-transport layers. Olga Malinkiewicz et al., Nature Photonics, Vol 8, p128-132 (2014)
Perovskite solar cell overviews:
- Hybrid solar cells- Perovskites under the Sun. Maria Antonietta Loi & Jan C. Hummelen, Nature Materials, V 12, p1087-1089 (2013)
- Perovskite-Based Solar Cells. Gary Hodes, Science magazine, Vol 342, p317-318 (2013)
A general perovskite review by Henry Snaith:
- Perovskites: The Emergence of a New Era for Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cells. Henry J. Snaith, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Vol 4, p3623-3630 (2013)
Key perovskite papers:
- Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates. Pablo Docampo et al., Nature Communications, Vol 4, Article 2761 (2013)
- Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Samula D. Stranks et al., Science magazine, Vol 342, p341-344 (2013)
- High Charge Carrier Mobilities and Lifetimes in Organolead Trihalide Perovskites. Christian Wehrenfennig et al., Advanced Materials, Vol 26, p1584-1589 (2013)
- Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy Environmental Science, James M. Ball et al., Vol 6, p1739-1743 (2013)